Alert icon Keyboard navigation enabled.
Alert icon TAB or Shift+TAB to navigate across. Down ↓ to open menu. ESC to close menu.
Alert icon Down ↓ to select section. Right → to activate. Up ↑ / Down ↓ / Tab to traverse all. ESC to exit.
BeyondTrust
Skip to content Use space or enter to skip.

What can we help you find today?

Instant Results
  • Website Results
  • Technical Documentation

Filter Options

Focus your search

Filtering by

Your recent searches:

Contact Us Chat with Sales Get Support
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • français
  • español
  • 한국어
  • português
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • GHOST Vulnerability...Scary Indeed current page
Link copied

GHOST Vulnerability...Scary Indeed

Jan 28, 2015
Author:
Slang
Scott Lang
Sr. Director, Product Marketing at BeyondTrust
Blog banner default
GHOST Vulnerability...Scary Indeed
Slang
Scott Lang
Sr. Director, Product Marketing at BeyondTrust
ПечатьA vulnerability discovered by Qualys security researchers has surfaced within the GNU C Library that affects virtually all Linux operating systems. The vulnerability lies within the various gethostbyname*() functions and, as such, has been dubbed “GHOST.” GHOST is particularly nasty considering remote, arbitrary code execution can be achieved. In an effort to avoid taxing DNS lookups, glibc developers introduced the __nss_hostname_digits_dots() function which makes a call to the infamous strcpy() function. As such, the array bounds are not limited by a size constraint and __nss_hostname_digits_dots() falls victim to a classic buffer overflow. That said, the only way to reach this vulnerable code path is through invoking calls to the gethostbyname*() function set, which many popular network applications utilize. In spite of this, there are some mitigating factors which help reduce the overall impact of the issue. For example, the gethostbyname*() functions are being slowly deprecated in favor of getaddrinfo() and some servers only utilize them to perform forward-confirmed reverse DNS lookups, meaning hostnames (which must adhere to strict formatting limitations, in order to reach the vulnerable code) oftentimes will be filtered and sanitized. Additionally, a patch has been around for a while because the bug was actually fixed in May of 2013. Although, at the time, it was not considered a security issue and the patch has since been left out of most stable and long-term-support Linux distributions. That’s not to say that GHOST should be taken lightly. Some of the most popular Linux applications are in fact vulnerable, such as the ping and arping utilities, along with the procmail and exim internet mailing software suites, just to name a few. As part of their analysis, Qualys demonstrated the severity of the issue by developing a working proof-of-concept exploit against the Exim mail server, bypassing existing protection mechanisms such as ASLR. They have indicated that they will be releasing a Metasploit module soon, which makes patching this vulnerability a priority for system administrators. Lastly, an interesting note worth mentioning is that the vulnerability was announced using coordinated disclosure, however, there was a discrepancy during the process in which someone leaked details prior to the coordinated release time. This, unfortunately, gave malicious hackers an opportunity to develop exploit code, which could have been used to attack vulnerable systems. All the more reason to scan your systems for potential GHOST vulnerabilities. As various Linux distributions catch up on releasing fixed packages, BeyondTrust will strive to provide the latest Retina audits concerning The GHOST Vulnerability. Audits release version 2872 provides the following audits: 44739 - RHSA-2015:0090 - glibc security update 44738 - RHSA-2015:0092 - glibc security update 44762 - RHSA-2015:0099 - glibc security update 44760 - RHSA-2015:0101 - glibc security update 44763 - CESA-2015:0090 - glibc security update 44764 - CESA-2015:0092 - glibc security update 44719 - DSA-3142-1: eglibc 44720 - USN-2485-1: GNU C Library 44767 - ELSA-2015-0090: glibc 44765 - ELSA-2015-0092: glibc - v7 44770 - ELSA-2015-0092: glibc - v6 44766 - SUSE-SU-2015:0158-1: glibc - SuSE 11 44768 - SUSE-SU-2015:0158-1: glibc - SuSE 10 44769 - SLSA-2015:0090-1: glibc 44771 - SLSA-2015:0092-1: glibc - SL6 44772 - SLSA-2015:0092-1: glibc - SL7
Latest Posts
  • The Most Common & Most Dangerous Types of Shadow IT
    Jun 5, 2026 The Most Common & Most Dangerous Types of Shadow IT
    Blog
    19m
  • 14 Password Management Best Practices
    May 28, 2026 14 Password Management Best Practices
    Blog
    12m
  • A Security Researcher’s Guide to Understanding Copilot Studio AI Agents
    May 26, 2026 A Security Researcher’s Guide to Understanding Copilot Studio AI Agents
    Blog
    3m
  • How to Secure Cloud-Native Infrastructure at Scale and Speed: A Conversation with Madhu Adireddi
    May 21, 2026 How to Secure Cloud-Native Infrastructure at Scale and Speed: A Conversation with Madhu Adireddi
    Blog
    5m
  • Cybersecurity as a Boardroom Priority for Major African TelCos
    May 12, 2026 Cybersecurity as a Boardroom Priority for Major African TelCos
    Blog
    8m
Related
  • Managing User Access for Both Privileged and Non-Privileged Accounts with BeyondTrust and SailPoint
    Apr 15, 2019 Managing User Access for Both Privileged and Non-Privileged Accounts with BeyondTrust and SailPoint
    Blog
    1m
  • 3 Powerful Strategies for CISOs to Boost their Organizational Influence
    Feb 22, 2021 3 Powerful Strategies for CISOs to Boost their Organizational Influence
    Blog
    1m
Share this Article
  • Link
Stay up to Date
Get the latest news, ideas, and tactics from BeyondTrust. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Keep up with BeyondTrust

Customer Support Get Started
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Add BeyondTrust as a preferred source on Google
  • Privacy
  • Security
  • Manage Cookies
  • Do Not Sell My Data
  • WEEE Compliance

Copyright © 2003 — 2026 BeyondTrust Corporation. All rights reserved. Other trademarks identified on this page are owned by their respective owners. BeyondTrust Corporation is not a chartered bank or trust company, or depository institution. It is not authorized to accept deposits or trust accounts and is not licensed or regulated by any state or federal banking authority.

Prefers reduced motion setting detected. Animations will now be reduced as a result.